首页> 外文OA文献 >Dietitians' practice in giving carbohydrate advice in the management of type 2 diabetes: a mixed methods study
【2h】

Dietitians' practice in giving carbohydrate advice in the management of type 2 diabetes: a mixed methods study

机译:营养师在2型糖尿病的治疗中提供碳水化合物建议的实践:混合方法研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Carbohydrate is accepted as the principal nutrient affecting blood glucose in diabetes; however, current guidelines are unable to specify the optimal quantity of carbohydrate for glycaemic control. No studies exist that describe current practice amongst healthcare professionals giving carbohydrate advice in type 2 diabetes. The present study aims to improve understanding of the degree of variation in the current practice of UK registered dietitians (RDs) by describing how RDs advise patients.\udMethods: UK RDs were contacted through national networks and asked to complete an online survey, which was analysed using stata, version 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Three consultations between dietitians and patients with type 2 diabetes were observed, followed by semi-structured interviews with the dietitians.\udResults: In total, 320 complete survey responses were received. Dietitians' advice varied according to expertise, training and confidence, and the complexity of the patient's blood glucose treatment. Some 48% (n = 154) of respondents advised patients to restrict carbohydrate intake either occasionally or frequently, with 35.6% (n = 114) considering 30–39% of total energy from carbohydrate to be a realistic expectation. The overall theme from the interviews was ‘Conflicting Priorities’, with three sub-themes: (i) how treatment decisions are made; (ii) the difference between empowerment and advice; and (iii) contradictory advice. A disparity existed between what was observed and interview data on how dietitians rationalise the type of carbohydrate advice provided.\udConclusions: Dietitians' advice varies for a number of reasons. Consensus exists in some areas (e.g. carbohydrate awareness advice); however, clear definitions of such terms are lacking. Clarification of interventions may improve the consistency of approach and improve patient outcomes.
机译:背景:碳水化合物被认为是影响糖尿病血糖的主要营养素。但是,当前的指南无法指定用于血糖控制的最佳碳水化合物量。没有研究描述在2型糖尿病中提供碳水化合物建议的医疗保健专业人员中的当前实践。本研究旨在通过描述RD建议患者的方式来增进对英国注册营养师(RD)当前实践中变异程度的了解。\ udMethods:通过国家网络与UK RD联系,并要求他们完成在线调查,使用第12版(StataCorp,美国德克萨斯州大学城)的Stata进行了分析。营养师和2型糖尿病患者进行了3次会诊,随后对营养师进行了半结构式访谈。\ ud结果:总共收到了320份完整的调查问卷。营养师的建议会根据专业知识,培训和信心以及患者血糖治疗的复杂性而有所不同。约48%(n = 154)的被调查者建议患者偶尔或频繁限制碳水化合物的摄入,而35.6%(n = 114)的患者认为碳水化合物的总能量的30-39%是一个现实的期望。访谈的总体主题是“冲突优先权”,包括三个子主题:(i)如何制定治疗决策; (ii)授权和建议之间的区别; (iii)相互矛盾的意见。营养师如何合理化所提供的碳水化合物建议的类型与观察到的数据和访谈数据之间存在差异。\ ud结论:营养师的建议因多种原因而有所不同。在某些领域存在共识(例如,碳水化合物意识建议);但是,缺少此类术语的明确定义。明确干预措施可以改善方法的一致性并改善患者预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号